ArXiv新规：若论文含AI生成不当内容将禁投一年ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop
ArXiv近日宣布新规，若提交的科研论文包含由生成式AI产生的 plagiarized、biased、错误或误导性内容且无作者责任声明，作者将被禁止投稿一年。该政策针对的是未明确标注AI使用情况或放任AI输出低质内容的学术行为。此举旨在维护学术诚信与内容可靠性，尤其防范AI生成的虚假引用和事实错误。新规反映了学术界对AI滥用的日益担忧，标志着开放科学平台开始强化内容治理机制。
Samantha Cole
ArXiv, the open-access repository of preprint academic research, will ban authors of papers for a year if they submit obviously AI-generated work.
Late Thursday evening, Thomas Dietterich, chair of the computer science section of ArXiv, wrote on X: “If generative AI tools generate inappropriate language, plagiarized content, biased content, errors, mistakes, incorrect references, or misleading content, and that output is included in scientific works, it is the responsibility of the author(s). We have recently clarified our penalties for this. If a submission contains incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation, this means we can't trust anything in the paper.”
Examples of incontrovertible evidence, he wrote, include “hallucinated references, meta-comments from the LLM (‘here is a 200 word summary; would you like me to make any changes?’; ‘the data in this table is illustrative, fill it in with the real numbers from your experiments’.”
“The penalty is a 1-year ban from arXiv followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions must first be accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue,” Dietterich wrote.
This post is for paid members only
Become a paid member for unlimited ad-free access to articles, bonus podcast content, and more.
Subscribe
Sign up for free access to this post
Free members get access to posts like this one along with an email round-up of our week's stories.
Subscribe
Already have an account? Sign in
需要完整排版与评论请前往来源站点阅读。